Written question asked by Lord Strathclyde (Conservative), in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 18 November 2003. It was answered by Lord Whitty (Labour) on Tuesday, 18 November 2003.
Whitty, Lord
- Question
- Further to the Answer by the Lord Chancellor on 18 September 2003 652 c1066 that "attempts were made to reach a consensus. This House rejected an elected element and voted for an appointed-only Chamber" and that the Government intended to proceed to legislate for an appointed-only House of Lords, whether the same principle will be applied in the case of hunting, where unsuccessful attempts have been made to reach a consensus and where the House of Lords has on a free vote rejected a ban on hunting and voted for registered hunting; and, if not, why not. [HL 5038].
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 654 c286WA; HL 5038
- Session
- 2002-03
- Subjects
- Hunting
- Legislation
- Hunting Bill 2002/03
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2020-07-28 11:51:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_802782
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_802782
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_802782