Skip to main content

Written question asked by Llew Smith (Labour) on Wednesday, 19 March 2003, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 26 March 2003. It was answered by Baroness Harman (Labour) on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 on behalf of the Solicitor General.


Solicitor-General

Question
To ask the Solicitor General, pursuant to her Answer of 17th March, Official Report, 401 c515-6W, on Iraq, whether the Attorney General provided the information contained in paragraphs 1-7 on his legal note on Iraq: Legal Basis for the Use of Force, to the United Kingdom Ambassador to the United Nations in advance of Sir Jeremy Greenstock's remarks to the United Nations Security Council on UNSC Resolution 1441 (2002) on 8th November 2002.
Answer

Llew Smith: To ask the Solicitor-General pursuant to her answer of 17 March 2003, Official Report, columns 515-16, on Iraq, whether the Attorney- General provided the information contained in paragraphs 1 to 7 on his legal note on "Iraq: Legal Basis for the Use of Force", to the United Kingdom Ambassador to the United Nations in advance of Sir Jeremy Greenstock's remarks to the United Nations Security Council on UNSC Resolution 1441 (2002) on 8 November 2002. [104715] The Solicitor-General: There is a longstanding convention observed by successive Government that the fact of and substance of advice which the Law Officers may have given to Government is not publicly disclosed. This enables the Government, like everyone else, to obtain frank and full legal advice in confidence. The Attorney General gave a written answer on 17 March in the House of Lords which set out his view of the legal basis for the use of force against Iraq. However, the convention against disclosure of Law Officers' advice still applies in relation to advice which the Law Officers give within Government.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
104715; 402 c235-6W
Session
2002-03
Subjects
Armed conflict Inspections Iraq Legal opinion International law Weapons UN resolutions Iraq conflict
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk