Skip to main content

Written question asked by Nigel Evans (Conservative) on Friday, 7 February 2003, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 24 February 2003. It was answered by Brian Wilson (Labour) on Monday, 24 February 2003 on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry.


Dept of Trade and Industry

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what her assessment is of the effectiveness of emissions scrubbers in removing mercury pollutants from power station emissions. - Inc figures.
Answer

Mr. Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her assessment is of the effectiveness of emissions scrubbers in removing mercury pollutants from power station emissions. [97522] Mr. Wilson: There are a number of factors which affect the effectiveness of scrubbers removing mercury emissions. Around 40-60 per cent. of the mercury produced during coal combustion is in the elemental vapour form and the type of wet scrubbers used on coal- fired plant (eg flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) used for sulphur dioxide control) are not effective in removing this form of mercury from the flue gas. Of the remaining mercury, which is in an oxidised form, wet emissions scrubbers have been shown to be effective. In summary, it is estimated that about 50 per cent. of mercury produced is removed by wet scrubbers. There is no information on dry scrubbers although there is research being carried out on this. A study on the monitoring and control of trace elements from coal-fired power generation is about to be let within the DTI's Cleaner Coal Technology Programme and this will include mercury emissions, their measurement, and their effects, and will cover the emerging legislative and policy issues.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
97522; 400 c69W;400 c69-70W
Session
2002-03
Subjects
Exhaust emissions Power stations Pollution control Standards Mercury
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk