Written question asked by Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat), in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 31 March 2004. It was answered by Lord Rooker (Labour) on Wednesday, 31 March 2004.
Rooker, RtHonLord
- Question
- Whether it is necessary for the Housing Corporation to be located in London; and, if not, what would be the estimated annual savings if it were located in Liverpool or a city with comparable costs. [HL 2128]. - Including figures.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL 2128; 659 c164-5WA
- Session
- 2003-04
- Subjects
- Costs Greater London Housing Corporation Location Staff Liverpool
- Contains statistics
- Yes
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-24 21:58:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_885446
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_885446
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_885446