Skip to main content

Written question asked by Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat) on Monday, 15 March 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 23 March 2004. It was answered by Hazel Blears (Labour) on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 on behalf of the Home Office.


Home Office

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to attend a police station to provide fingerprints and photographs after being found guilty under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii) 2002 and (iii) 2003.
Answer

Mr. Roger Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were required to attend a police station to provide fingerprints and photographs after being found guilty under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii) 2002 and (iii) 2003. [162182] Ms Blears: Under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 a Magistrates' Court may make an order for a dog to be kept under proper control or for the destruction of the dog. The section does not create an offence. The powers under sections 27 and 61 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984, (as amended), to take fingerprints without consent from convicted persons are restricted to persons who have been convicted for a recordable offence. Recordable offences are those which have to be recorded on the Police National Computer to form part of a person's criminal record. They are set out in the National Police records (Recordable Offences) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000 No 1139) (as amended). They include convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings given in respect of an offence punishable with imprisonment and any offence specified in the Schedule to the regulations. Under section 64A(1) of PACE, a constable or designated person may photograph a person detained at a police station with or without that person's consent. Where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting the involvement of a person in a criminal offence, but that person is at a police station voluntarily and not detained, there are no powers to take fingerprints or photograph that person without consent.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
419 c776-7W;419 c778-9W; 162182
Session
2003-04
Subjects
Fingerprints Dogs Identification of criminals Offenders Photographs
Legislation
Dogs Act 1871
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk