1-18 of 18 results for legtitle:"Dogs Act 1871"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.203 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- legtitle:"Dogs Act 1871"
- We searched for
- legislationTitle_t:"Dogs Act 1871" OR legislationTitle_ses:378187
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people in Wales have been subject to proceedings in a magistrates' court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in each year since 1997; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people in Wales have been subject to proceedings in a magistrates' court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in each year since 1997; and if she will make a statement.
The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates' court under Section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871, within Wales police force areas, from 1997 to 2014 (the latest available), can be viewed in table 1
The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates' court for selected offences under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, within Wales police force areas, from 1991 to 2014 (the latest available), can be viewed in table 2
Dog attacks are not recorded centrally. However, the attached table provides numbers of successful prosecutions against people who have allowed a dog to be dangerously out of control for each of the last two years for which figures are available.
Table 1
| |||||||||||||||||
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | ||||||||
97 | 116 | 82 | 64 | 69 | 57 | 45 | 29 | 26 | 17 | ||||||||
2007 | 2008(5) | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||
18 | 15 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | ||||||||||
(1) Own a dangerous dog not kept under control (2) The Police force areas within Wales are: North Wales, Gwent; South Wales, Dyfed-Powys (3) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. (4) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data collection process and their inevitable limitation are taken into account when those data are used. (5) Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates' court for April, July and August 2008. |
Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice Ref: PQC16790
Table 2
Number of persons proceeded against at magistrates' court for selected offences(1) under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, within Wales police force areas, 1991 to 2014 (3)(4) Number of proceedings | ||||||||||
1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | |
0 | 41 | 54 | 13 | 28 | 24 | 27 | 44 | 66 | 90 | |
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008(5 | 2009 | 2010 | |
79 | 78 | 76 | 89 | 73 | 66 | 77 | 72 | 78 | 96 | |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||
104 | 143 | 100 | 98 | |||||||
(1) Includes offences under section 1(3), 3 (1) and 3(3) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 which came into effect on 12 August 1991 (2) the Police force areas within Wales are: North Wales, Gwent; South Wales; Dyfed-Powys (3) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. (4) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. (5) Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates' court for April, July and August 2008. | ||||||||||
Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice Ref: PQC16879
.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people were (a) proceeded against and (b) convicted of an offence under section 2 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1871 in England in 2014.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people were (a) proceeded against and (b) convicted of an offence under section 2 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1871 in England in 2014.
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and found guilty at all courts of offences under Section 3 and 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 can be viewed in Table 1 and Section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871, in England in 2014, can be viewed in Table 2.
Criminal justice statistics for 2015 are planned for publication in spring 2016.
Centrally held data cannot separately identify whether or not an attack took place in a public or a private place. This information may be held in individual court files, which could only be inspected at disproportionate cost.
With regard to the calendar split, no defendants were proceeded against at magistrates’ courts on the enhanced offences until June 2014; hence data for May has been retained together and a split from June to December presented.
Meanwhile, data reported to the Ministry of Justice, and held on the Court Proceedings Database, pertaining to criminal cases which were concluded at all courts in England and Wales between 20 October 2014 and 31 December 2014 (latest currently available) indicate that none of the Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs) issued were as a result of a conviction for a criminal offence specifically relating to dogs under the anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policy Act 2014.
The Ministry of Justice holds no information centrally on Community Protection Notices or injunctions related to powers under this Act.
Table 1
Defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts of offences under selected sections of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, England, 2014 (1)(2) |
Legislation | Outcome | January To May | June To December | Total |
Section 3(1) Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 | Proceeded Against Found Guilty | 444
325 | 718
553 | 1,163
878
|
Section 3 Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 | Proceeded Against Found Guilty | -
- | 3
2 | 3
2 |
(1) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice. Ref: 271-15 PQC 1009 - 1010 & 1013
Table 2
Defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts of offences under the Dogs Act 1871, England, 2014 (1)(2) | |
Proceeded against | Found guilty |
59 | 10 |
(1) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. | |
(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | |
Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice. Ref: 271-15 PQC 101
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people were (a) proceeded against and (b) convicted of an offence under section 2 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1871 in England in 2014.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people were (a) proceeded against and (b) convicted of an offence under section 2 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1871 in England in 2014.
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and found guilty at all courts of offences under Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and Section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871, in England in 2014, can be viewed in the below table.
Defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts of selected offences related to dogs legislation, England, 2014 (1)(2)
Legislation | Proceeded against | Found guilty |
Section 3(1) Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 | 1,163 | 878 |
Section 2 Dogs Act 1871 | 59 | 10 |
(1) The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people have been (a) proceeded against and (b) convicted of an offence under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in England in each year from 1997 to 2014.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many people have been (a) proceeded against and (b) convicted of an offence under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in England in each year from 1997 to 2014.
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and found guilty at all courts of offences under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 and Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 in England from 1997 to 2013 is in the table attached and has also been sent to the House Library.
Criminal court proceedings data for 2014 are planned for publication in May 2015.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people were subject to proceedings in a magistrates' court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in 2012; and if he will make a statement;
[137961]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people were subject to proceedings in a magistrates' court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in 2012; and if he will make a statement;
[137961]
The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts under the requested sections of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, in England and Wales, in 2011, can be viewed in the following table.
Court proceedings statistics for 2012 are planned for publication in May 2013.
| Defendants
proceeded against at magistrates court under selected sections of the
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, England and Wales, 20111,
2 | |
| Section
of
Act | Proceeded
against |
| 1(3) | 288 |
| 3(1) | 1,089 |
| 3(3) | 59 |
| 1
The figures given in the table relate to persons for whom these
offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with.
When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is
the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same
disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is
the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most
severe. 2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice |
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many people were subject to proceedings in a magistrates' court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in 2011; and if he will make a statement.
[124774]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many people were subject to proceedings in a magistrates' court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in 2011; and if he will make a statement.
[124774]
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 cannot be separately identified from offences under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1989.
The number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1989, in England and Wales in 2011 is 129.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people have been subject to proceedings in a magistrates court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in each year since 2005.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people have been subject to proceedings in a magistrates court for offences under the Dogs Act 1871 in each year since 2005.
| Number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences related to dogs¹, England and Wales, 2005-10²,³ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 20084 | 2009 | 2010 | |
| Total proceeded against | 306 | 232 | 269 | 199 | 135 | 184 |
| ¹ Includes offences under: | ||||||
| Dogs Act 1871, section 2—Owning dangerous dog not kept under control; | ||||||
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989, section 1(3)—Failing to comply with control order made under Dogs Act 1871, section 2; | ||||||
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989, section 1(3)—Failing to comply with destruction order made under Dangerous Dogs Act 1989, section 1(1)(a); | ||||||
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989, section 1(6)—Having custody of dog in breach of disqualification order. | ||||||
| ² The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. | ||||||
| ³ Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | ||||||
| 4 Excludes data for Cardiff magistrates court for April, July and August 2008. | ||||||
| Source: | ||||||
| Justice Statistics Analytical Services—Ministry of Justice |
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs against how many people orders have been made under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in each year since 1997.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs against how many people orders have been made under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in each year since 1997.
How many people have been prosecuted in England and Wales under Sections 1(2)(a), 1(2)(d), 1(2)(e) and 1(3) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 for each year since 1992.
How many people have been prosecuted in England and Wales under Sections 1(2)(a), 1(2)(d), 1(2)(e) and 1(3) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 for each year since 1992.
| The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates’ court for offences relating to the Dangerous Dogs Acts 1989 and 1871 Section 2 and Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sections 1(2)(a), 1(2)(d), 1(2)(e) and 1(3) in England and Wales 1992-2005 (1) (2) (3) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statute | Offence description | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989. Dogs Act 1871 Sec. 2. | Failure to comply with an order to keep a dog under proper control etc. Dangerous dog not kept under proper control. | 889 | 609 | 551 | 510 | 513 | 492 | 454 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(a). | Breeding or breeding from a fighting dog. | 31 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(d). | Allowing a fighting dog to be in a public place without a muzzle or a lead. | 187 | 74 | 24 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 7 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(e). | Abandoning, or allowing to stray, a fighting dog. | 27 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | - |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(3). | Possession, without exemption, of a Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa or other designated fighting dog. | 209 | 167 | 57 | 35 | 18 | 15 | 23 |
| Total | 1,343 | 871 | 641 | 569 | 550 | 523 | 489 |
| Statute | Offence description | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989. Dogs Act 1871 Sec. 2. | Failure to comply with an order to keep a dog under proper control etc. Dangerous dog not kept under proper control. | 401 | 462 | 374 | 336 | 335 | 352 | 306 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(a). | Breeding or breeding from a fighting dog. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 3 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(d). | Allowing a fighting dog to be in a public place without a muzzle or a lead. | 11 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(e). | Abandoning, or allowing to stray, a fighting dog. | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(3). | Possession, without exemption, of a Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa or other designated fighting dog. | 12 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| Total | 427 | 478 | 383 | 352 | 342 | 374 | 324 | |
| - NIL | ||||||||
| (1) These data are on the principal offence basis. | ||||||||
| (2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | ||||||||
| (3) Staffordshire police force was able to submit sample data only for persons proceeded against and convicted in the magistrates' courts for the year 2000. Although sufficient to estimate higher orders of data, these data are not robust enough at a detailed level and have been excluded from the table. | ||||||||
| Our ref: PQ HL1625 and HL1626 | ||||||||
| Source: RDS Office for Criminal Justice Reform |
asked Her Majesty's Government:How many people have been prosecuted under Section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in England and Wales for each year since 1992; and
asked Her Majesty's Government:How many people have been prosecuted under Section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in England and Wales for each year since 1992; and
| The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates’ court for offences relating to the Dangerous Dogs Acts 1989 and 1871 Section 2 and Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sections 1(2)(a), 1(2)(d), 1(2)(e) and 1(3) in England and Wales 1992-2005 (1) (2) (3) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statute | Offence description | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989. Dogs Act 1871 Sec. 2. | Failure to comply with an order to keep a dog under proper control etc. Dangerous dog not kept under proper control. | 889 | 609 | 551 | 510 | 513 | 492 | 454 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(a). | Breeding or breeding from a fighting dog. | 31 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(d). | Allowing a fighting dog to be in a public place without a muzzle or a lead. | 187 | 74 | 24 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 7 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(e). | Abandoning, or allowing to stray, a fighting dog. | 27 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | - |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(3). | Possession, without exemption, of a Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa or other designated fighting dog. | 209 | 167 | 57 | 35 | 18 | 15 | 23 |
| Total | 1,343 | 871 | 641 | 569 | 550 | 523 | 489 |
| Statute | Offence description | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1989. Dogs Act 1871 Sec. 2. | Failure to comply with an order to keep a dog under proper control etc. Dangerous dog not kept under proper control. | 401 | 462 | 374 | 336 | 335 | 352 | 306 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(a). | Breeding or breeding from a fighting dog. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 3 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(d). | Allowing a fighting dog to be in a public place without a muzzle or a lead. | 11 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(2)(e). | Abandoning, or allowing to stray, a fighting dog. | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 Sec. 1(3). | Possession, without exemption, of a Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa or other designated fighting dog. | 12 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| Total | 427 | 478 | 383 | 352 | 342 | 374 | 324 | |
| - NIL | ||||||||
| (1) These data are on the principal offence basis. | ||||||||
| (2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. | ||||||||
| (3) Staffordshire police force was able to submit sample data only for persons proceeded against and convicted in the magistrates' courts for the year 2000. Although sufficient to estimate higher orders of data, these data are not robust enough at a detailed level and have been excluded from the table. | ||||||||
| Our ref: PQ HL1625 and HL1626 | ||||||||
| Source: RDS Office for Criminal Justice Reform |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to provide DNA samples as a result of (a) enquiries and (b) convictions in connection with section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (i) Wales and (ii) England in (A) 2001, (B) 2002 and...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to provide DNA samples as a result of (a) enquiries and (b) convictions in connection with section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (i) Wales and (ii) England in (A) 2001, (B) 2002 and...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to attend a police station to provide fingerprints and photographs after being found guilty under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii) 2002 and (iii)...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to attend a police station to provide fingerprints and photographs after being found guilty under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii) 2002 and (iii)...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to provide fingerprints and photographs when attending a police station in connection with a possible offence relating to section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii)...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were required to provide fingerprints and photographs when attending a police station in connection with a possible offence relating to section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii)...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many successful prosecutions were carried out under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii) 2002 and (iii) 2003. - Inc table.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many successful prosecutions were carried out under section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 in (a) Wales and (b) England in (i) 2001, (ii) 2002 and (iii) 2003. - Inc table.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many prosecutions were brought (a) successfully and (b) unsuccessfully under (i) the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and (ii) the Dogs Act 1871, broken down by police authority, in each of the last three years; and if he will make...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many prosecutions were brought (a) successfully and (b) unsuccessfully under (i) the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and (ii) the Dogs Act 1871, broken down by police authority, in each of the last three years; and if he will make...
How many cases have been brought in respect of powerful breeds of dog, including rottweilers, pit-bull terriers, the Tosa and dobermanns, in respect of powers or offences under (a) section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, in respect of a dog owner's recklessness, (b) section 28 of...
How many cases have been brought in respect of powerful breeds of dog, including rottweilers, pit-bull terriers, the Tosa and dobermanns, in respect of powers or offences under (a) section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, in respect of a dog owner's recklessness, (b) section 28 of...
An Act to provide further Protection against Dogs.
An Act to provide further Protection against Dogs.