Skip to main content

Written question asked by Mike Hancock (Liberal Democrat) on Thursday, 12 February 2004, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 2 March 2004. It was answered by Caroline Flint (Labour) on Tuesday, 2 March 2004 on behalf of the Home Office.


Home Office

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his Answer of 20th January, 416 c1205W, on animal welfare, ref 147328, with reference to recommendation 12, what steps the Government has taken to urge EU member states to make replacements a priority.
Answer

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to his answer of 20 January 2004, Official Report, column 1205W, on animal welfare, with reference to recommendation 12, what steps the Government have taken to urge EU member states to make replacements a priority. [155972] Caroline Flint: In its report, published in July 2002, the House of Lords Select Committee on Animals in Scientific Procedures recommended that the United Kingdom Government should use their influence to urge the European Union to make the development and validation of replacements for animal experiments a priority, particularly in toxicology. In our response, published in January 2003, the Government noted the Select Committee's view and agreed that replacement should be the ultimate goal. We also explained that we do not believe that it should be made a priority at the expense of reduction or refinement, as these are where progress can be made more quickly. We are instead fully committed to the furtherance of all of the 3Rs--the replacement of animal use, reduction of the number of animals used and the refinement of the procedures involved to minimise suffering. United Kingdom Government Departments and agencies are involved in a number of specific initiatives in the European Union to develop, validate and incorporate more advanced test methods into regulatory practice. The Government also continue to support the work of the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and the head of the Home Office Animals Scientific Procedures Division is now the United Kingdom representative on the ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee and is contributing to discussions about the future direction of ECVAM's work. The Government also warmly welcome the liaison between ECVAM and its United States counterpart, the Interagency Co-ordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), as a means of achieving greater progress, more quickly and ensuring commitment from more than one economic region. Quick gains cannot necessarily be expected, but we shall continue our efforts to persuade other member states of the importance of progress on the 3Rs.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
418 c894-5W;418 c910-1W; 155972
Session
2003-04
Subjects
Animal welfare Animal experiments EU action Poisons Select Committee on Animals in Scientific Procedures
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk