Proceeding contribution from Michael Jack (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
: Perhaps my right hon. Friend’s assiduous reading of the Select Committee evidence did not include the supplementary memorandum submitted by the centre for rural economy at the university of Newcastle, which points out that the Environment Agency was not originally included in Lord Haskins’s first examination of rural delivery.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 434 c1023
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disadvantaged Biodiversity Departmental responsibilities Enforcement Environment protection Joint Nature Conservation Committee Motor vehicles Nature conservation Pesticides Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Sites of special scientific interest Cycleways Commission for Rural Communities Inland Waterways Advisory Council Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:47:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_250261
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_250261
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_250261