Proceeding contribution from Charles Clarke (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 20 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
First, there is a clear difference between the way in which the law treats ““good”” and ““bad”” landlords, in the sense that the ““bad”” landlords will have a series of sanctions that apply against them, and rightly so, while the ““good”” landlord will not. Secondly, it is important to stimulate every landlord, good or bad, to recognise that the welfare of an area depends on all landlords working together to drive out the bad and encourage the good. I believe that the Bill will help with that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 435 c548
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Airguns Licensing Firearms Imitation firearms Licensed premises Drunkenness Misuse Offensive weapons Public order offences Sales Schools Young people Sexual offences Right of search Drinking banning orders Alcohol disorder zones Night-time economy
- Legislation
- Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 21:20:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_252471
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_252471
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_252471