Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 July 2005. It occurred during Question for short debate on Cyprus: Annan Plan.


Cyprus: Annan Plan

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for his intervention. The Council of Europe has not been raised by noble Lords, so I am not responding to that point. However, I recognise the fundamental role that the Council of Europe has played and will continue to play. I am sure that all noble Lords will agree that the search for a settlement in Cyprus should remain a top priority for British foreign policy. I can assure noble Lords that it will. The UK Government remain firmly committed to achieving a bi-zonal, bi-communal, federal solution to the Cyprus problem. We welcome the recent fact-finding mission to the region by Sir Kieran Prendergast, the UN Under-Secretary-General for political affairs. However, sadly, his report to the Security Council concluded that the gap between the stated positions of the parties appears to be widening and confidence between them is not high. The fact that he undertook such a fact-finding mission is in itself a small step forward. Today’s debate has reminded us all that in the mean time, while we wait for an acceptable solution, one practical thing that the UK and the EU can, and must, do is to help the Turkish Cypriots put this waiting period to good use, by allowing them to match the progress of their civil society with equally clear progress on the economic side. They have turned their backs on the politics of partition. We need to help them to resist the politics of despair.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c594 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Air routes Cyprus Employment Human rights EU institutions Ownership Property Marketing Trade Tourism Transport for London Sanctions Peace negotiations EU aid Northern Cyprus EU trade
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk