Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]  .


Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]

I support my noble friend’s amendment because the clause has extremely sweeping powers. It is not a simple question of dealing with amendments to the convention by order. Paragraph (b) clearly states that the subsection relates to,"““any international agreement relating to compensation for oil pollution from ships which modifies””" —that is fine—"““or replaces the whole or any part of, the Liability Convention””," and so on. My reading of that is that it, in effect, gives Her Majesty the power to replace primary legislation with secondary legislation. We need primary legislation to put the convention into place and I entirely accept that ““on the run”” modifications to compensation schemes and so on should be dealt with by Orders in Council, but—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c125GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Oil Pollution Merchant shipping Treaties Shipping Territorial waters International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage Countries International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships Statutory instruments
Legislation
Merchant Shipping (Pollution) Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk