Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]  .


Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]

No one is saying that there should be further primary legislation. We are saying that if the compensation scheme was to be changed to an enormous extent and the UK was liable to pay extra money, Parliament should at least have some chance of commenting on it. We certainly do not support primary legislation but we do want to know how far Parliament will be involved later on. We agree that there should not be primary legislation—as the noble Baroness said, the government of the day, which could be any government, would want to act quickly—but Parliament should obviously know about it and be able to comment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c126GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Oil Pollution Merchant shipping Treaties Shipping Territorial waters International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage Countries International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships Statutory instruments
Legislation
Merchant Shipping (Pollution) Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk