Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 July 2005. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Civil Partnership (Contracted-Out Occupational and Appropriate Personal Pension Schemes) (Surviving Civil Partners) Order 2005.
Civil Partnership (Contracted-out Occupational and Appropriate Personal Pension Schemes) (Surviving Civil Partners) Order 2005
Perhaps I may clarify the point. I asked why the RIA did not include costs specific to the particular orders. What the RIA in each case did was simply to repeat the totality of the assessment of the Civil Partnership Bill that was before Parliament last year. No attempt was made either to update that or to make it specific to what we are being required to consider.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c112GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Civil partnerships Workplace pensions Pensions Personal pensions Pension rights Social security benefits War pensions Widowed people
- Legislation
- Civil Partnership (Contracted-out Occupational and Appropriate Personal Pension Schemes) (Surviving Civil Partners) Order 2005
- Civil Partnership (Pensions and Benefit Payments) (Consequential etc Provisions) Order 2005
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:14:33 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257666
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257666
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257666