Proceeding contribution from James Purnell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 July 2005. It occurred during Opposition day on Licensing Act 2003.
Licensing Act 2003
I have responded to what ACRE—the representative body that we are dealing with—has asked us to do. It would be wrong to make a decision before the Act has come into force based on an inadequate understanding of the evidence involved. We are doing exactly as ACRE has requested, which is to look at the evidence that it collects and to refer it to Sir Les Elton, and if there are problems to try to address them in any way that we can. If there are matters that require primary legislation, we will have to wait for a legislative opportunity, but for those that do not require such change we will be happy to deal with them if there is evidence that that is required.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 436 c776-7
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Clubs Applications Licensing Licensed premises Local government Police Licensing laws Sports Village halls
- Legislation
- Licensing Act 2003
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:32:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_258168
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_258168
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_258168