Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
I also put my name to Amendment No. 4. It is difficult to add to what the two previous noble Lords have said. While welcoming this road safety grant proposal, I and, I am sure, the many other noble Lords who have tabled amendments, have been submerged by papers and lobbying from credible and committed people with different interests. They all have particular points of view, some of which we may agree with and some we may not. It is desperately important that as these things go ahead not only should the national transport authority publish an annual report, as has been set out in this amendment, but it should also analyse the effectiveness of the grants. As my noble friend Lord Simon said, it is very easy to come up with one’s own prejudices in these matters. The only solution is to have proper statistics and analysis that can be used as the basis on which to go forward and make any changes necessary in the future. I support this amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c14-5
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Cameras Grants Local government Roads Safety Speed limits
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-26 12:55:41 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260164
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260164
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260164