Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].

Fraud Bill [HL]

I am saying that if the noble and learned Lord does not like the word ““reckless””, what other formulation would he insert in the Bill to limit the scope of the offence? I am not saying that I shall not pursue the inclusion of ““reckless”” on Report; but if the noble and learned Lord comes up with a new formulation on Report which constrains the current formulation, I would be happy to yield over the question of ““reckless””. The noble Lord shakes his head; perhaps he would like to intervene again and pursue me.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 673 c1418-9
Session: 2005-06
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
Legislation: Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Fraud Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools