Proceeding contribution from Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].
Fraud Bill [HL]
I follow the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, and the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General, who have constantly referred back to the word ““dishonestly””. When the Attorney-General and the Committee reflect on this issue, they may consider that the beautiful simplicity is rather reduced by subsections (2) and (3). In reality, one does not need to go any further than to say that a representation is false if it is untrue or misleading. All the other details in the remainder of the subsections go to the question of dishonesty. It would be more beautiful and more simple if it stopped there. That is a broad consideration for the more detailed amendments that my noble friend is putting forward.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c1420
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
- Legislation
- Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:25:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263113
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263113
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263113