Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].


Fraud Bill [HL]

I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord. He spoke of the difficulty in defining secrecy, but later in his response asked: what better defence for the defendant to advance than an explanation of full disclosure? What would be wrong with putting that on the face of the Bill and not just leaving it for the jury to draw appropriate conclusions? If in the view of the noble and learned Lord full disclosure is sufficient to guarantee acquittal, surely that ought to appear on the face of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1434 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
Legislation
Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk