Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].


Fraud Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 17:"Page 2, line 32, after ““action”” insert ““, confidential information””" The noble Lord said: This is a full-blown probing amendment about the topic of confidential information. Information, particularly confidential information, is often a valuable commodity, and is sometimes treated by   the law as a kind of property, but its peculiar characteristics make it difficult to regard it as property in   the strict sense. It has been held that a dishonest obtaining of confidential information is not theft. We would like to probe the Government’s thinking on not including it in the Bill. I do not often cite the CPS in support of any proposition I make in these circumstances, but it stated that,"““the opportunity should be taken to extend the meaning to include confidential information and intangibles””." I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1434-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
Legislation
Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk