Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].
Fraud Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 17:"Page 2, line 32, after ““action”” insert ““, confidential information””" The noble Lord said: This is a full-blown probing amendment about the topic of confidential information. Information, particularly confidential information, is often a valuable commodity, and is sometimes treated by the law as a kind of property, but its peculiar characteristics make it difficult to regard it as property in the strict sense. It has been held that a dishonest obtaining of confidential information is not theft. We would like to probe the Government’s thinking on not including it in the Bill. I do not often cite the CPS in support of any proposition I make in these circumstances, but it stated that,"““the opportunity should be taken to extend the meaning to include confidential information and intangibles””." I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c1434-5
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
- Legislation
- Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:25:11 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263143
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263143
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263143