Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Fraud Bill [HL].
Fraud Bill [HL]
My point was that there were just over 1,000 cases in which the count of conspiracy to defraud was used. It would clearly have been an inappropriate count in many of the 14,000 cases, because there would only have been a single defendant. I was questioning whether the 7 per cent really meant anything in those circumstances.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c1448
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Abuse Crime Conspiracy Common law Fraud Exemptions Powers Misrepresentation Married people Sales Reform Caveat emptor rule
- Legislation
- Fraud Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:25:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263158
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263158
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_263158