Proceeding contribution from Adam Afriyie (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
I attended this debate because I wish to make a small point about cyclists and rights of way, but it sounds like a Home Office debate. I am astounded that amendment No. 4, which would insert the words"““which he has reason to believe may be relevant””" into clause 44 to justify entry into someone’s home or other premises has been rejected in such a cavalier fashion. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that that is very much like a totalitarian state?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c191
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Countryside Departmental responsibilities Enforcement Environment protection Motor vehicles Nuisance Public footpaths Nature conservation Pesticides National parks Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Cycleways Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:40:43 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264890
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264890
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264890