Proceeding contribution from James Paice (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
I appreciate the Minister’s efforts at brevity, but is he saying that if the inspector found some pesticides on a premises and took it away as described under clause 44(1)(c) but did not do so under PACE, that would still be admissible as evidence in court?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c195
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Countryside Departmental responsibilities Enforcement Environment protection Motor vehicles Nuisance Public footpaths Nature conservation Pesticides National parks Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Cycleways Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:40:43 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264896
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264896
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264896