Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Paice (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.


Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

Of course the prevention of the death of other birds is urgent, but it is not as urgent as stopping the present suffering of an animal. That is the issue that the Government’s draft animal welfare Bill seeks to address. A few moments ago I was trying to think of the new jargon for pet and it is, of course, a companion animal. Perhaps I should stick to ““pet””. In any case, the Government have not convinced us that it is necessary to have wide-ranging powers to deal with one issue when they do not propose to introduce those powers to address far wider problems in the animal welfare Bill. I could argue that point further, but I have made the principal points of concern and confirm that we wish to press the matter to a Division.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
437 c198 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Countryside Departmental responsibilities Enforcement Environment protection Motor vehicles Nuisance Public footpaths Nature conservation Pesticides National parks Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Cycleways Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
Legislation
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk