Proceeding contribution from Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
While I understand the concerns that the hon. Gentleman puts forward, does he accept that the great majority of users of motorised two-wheel vehicles in the countryside are responsible? In the early stage, when I was involved in trying to develop a dialogue between motor cyclists and the Government, it was obvious that the great majority of them and their organisations, such as the British Motorcyclists Federation and the Motorcycle Action Group, were keen to act and be seen to act responsibly. Does he agree that any legislation should not have punitive consequences for people who have never sought to break the law or cause inconvenience?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c205
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Countryside Departmental responsibilities Enforcement Environment protection Motor vehicles Nuisance Public footpaths Nature conservation Pesticides National parks Rights of way Wildlife Rural areas Cycleways Commission for Rural Communities Natural England
- Legislation
- Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:34:25 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264917
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264917
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_264917