Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Charities Bill [HL].


Charities Bill [HL]

My Lords, it is with some diffidence that I oppose the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, because he puts the case strongly and well, and we all genuinely want to diminish the bureaucratic burden on smaller charities. My reason for not being convinced by his case is very simple. There is the issue of bureaucracy and regulation; there is the issue of probity of charities in the sector. I did not agree with the noble Lord when he said that there was no systemic risk. I do not know why he said that or on what basis. If you are talking about an income of £10,000 a year, that could mean a capital base of £200,000, which is significant money. In fact, there is more prospect of the very rare amount of fraud that takes place in the charity sector among small charities than among large charities. Assets of £200,000 are very significant. In my balance between probity and regulation, I think that I am more satisfied, or assuaged, by the £5,000 limit rather than the £10,000 limit. For that reason, I am not persuaded by what the noble Lord has said.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c391-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Clubs Appeals Charities Armed forces Charity Commission Charitable donations Finance Fees and charges Fundraising Regulation Registration Tax allowances Taxation Sports Charity Tribunal
Legislation
Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk