Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 13 October 2005. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2005.
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2005
My Lords, if any of these organisations were so affronted by being placed on a proscribed list because they felt that they could conform to the law and operate as political, social or cultural organisations entirely legitimately, they would probably actively seek to discover what they could do about their proscription. As I described in introducing the order, there is a tried and tested route for those organisations to become legitimate in terms of the law. I can say no more than that and I commend the order. On Question, Motion agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 674 c496
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Appeals Proscribed organisations Terrorism Security South Asia
- Legislation
- Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2005
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:06:27 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266812
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266812
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266812