Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].


Children and Adoption Bill [HL]

I do not think that the noble Baroness need be frightened in any way of the word ““reasonable””. The difference in practical terms, if I could encapsulate it in a couple of sentences, is this: a presumption of ““contact”” means that a parent needs to explain why he wants reasonable contact and why it might be a good idea. A presumption of ““reasonable contact”” means that a parent needs to explain why and how there is a good enough reason to prevent reasonable contact. It is the onus of proof in a court. It has nothing to do with warring parents who cannot reach an agreement. This is what the court has to decide in determining a fair set of contact arrangements. That is how I would encapsulate it; and it is a crucial difference.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c14GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Adoption Contact orders Absent parents Domestic abuse Family proceedings Protection Parents Parental responsibility
Legislation
Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk