Proceeding contribution from Lord Northbourne (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Children and Adoption Bill [HL]
I was very interested by what the noble Lord said. I do not support the two amendments as they are drafted, but there is a case for the view that some certainty on what will happen if the parents do not reach agreement can be a powerful incentive to parents to get their heads together. That is one of the principles of the Florida system. If the parents do not reach agreement, they know that a 30:70 or a 60:40 order will be imposed. However, if they reach agreement and the court considers that they have argued the case well and there is a reasonable case for an alternative arrangement, the solution that they have agreed is accepted.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 674 c20GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Adoption Contact orders Absent parents Domestic abuse Family proceedings Protection Parents Parental responsibility
- Legislation
- Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:09:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266875
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266875
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266875