Proceeding contribution from Lord Northbourne (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
Children and Adoption Bill [HL]
The defect of both amendments, as I read them, is that they do not actually say what the mediation is for. My understanding is that the mediation which has proved successful in the United States is based on trying to secure an agreement between the parents to a parenting plan for the child—not for any other purpose, such as the money, the house, the cat or the Cadillac. It appears from the American experience that mediation does not work terribly well unless there has been a parent education meeting before. I am not entirely sure that that is built into the noble Baroness’s proposal. But there ought to be a definition of the purpose of the meeting. It is quite limited—it is to get the parents to realise that it will be better for them and for the child if they can agree a solution and not go to court.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 674 c25GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Adoption Contact orders Absent parents Domestic abuse Family proceedings Protection Parents Parental responsibility
- Legislation
- Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:46:53 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266883
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266883
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266883