Proceeding contribution from Baroness Primarolo (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
First, does the hon. Gentleman agree that if the legislation’s effect is to deter people from even bothering to devise schemes that seek not to pay the tax and national insurance that should have been paid—I sincerely hope it is—it will have done precisely what it aims to do, and all the things he is talking about, which no doubt we will explore in Committee, will not happen? Secondly, does the hon. Gentleman think that the general taxpayer, and the Government representing the general taxpayer, are also entitled to certainty about revenues? This is employment pay, so it should be subject to pay-as-you-earn and national insurance.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 438 c477
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Incentives Income tax Employees' contributions Employers' contributions National insurance Personal income Pay Payments National insurance contributions Small businesses Stocks and shares Tax avoidance Taxation Tax yields Enterprise management incentives Retrospective legislation
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:59:56 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270633
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270633
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_270633