Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
I was a teacher, and often taught in circumstances that were somewhat stressed. Removing ““reasonable”” puts the person who is trying to dissolve the conflict or resolve it at great risk. I do not understand why ““reasonable”” should be removed from any power that is given to a person in authority. That does not make sense to me as a former teacher.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 439 c698
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Airguns Licensing Further education Imitation firearms Licensed premises Drunkenness Misuse Offensive weapons Sales Schools Young people Right of search Students Drinking banning orders Anti-social behaviour orders Alcohol disorder zones
- Legislation
- Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:13:49 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274317
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274317
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274317