1-20 of 4,587 results for subject:"Anti-social behaviour orders"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.364 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.01 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Anti-social behaviour orders"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Anti-social behaviour orders" OR subject_t:"Anti social behaviour orders" OR subject_t:"Antisocial behaviour orders" OR subject_t:ASBOs OR subject_ses:8374
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government how many football banning orders have been issued in each year since 2010.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many football banning orders have been issued in each year since 2010.
The Home Office publishes annual figures on the number of football banning orders issued and the number of football-related arrests in England and Wales in the ‘Football-related arrests and banning orders, England and Wales’ Official Statistics publication. The latest data cover the 2021 to 2022 football season and are available here: Football-related arrests and banning orders, England and Wales: 2021 to 2022 season - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk). Data on the number of football banning orders issued and the number of football-related arrests for pitch incursion since the 2010 to 2011 season are published in tables 1 and 5 of the accompanying data tables.
There were 516 new banning orders issued in the 2021 to 2022 football season, down by 46% since the 2010 to 2011 season.
There were 313 football-related arrests for pitch incursion in the 2021 to 2022 football season, up by 30% since the 2010 to 2011 season.
Data on arrests for the offence of entering the playing area at a designated football match that have led to the imposition of football banning orders is not held. A football banning order is a preventative measure which is not issued as part of a sentence, or solely based on an individual’s conviction offence. In deciding whether to make a banning order, a court may consider a range of prosecution evidence in support of a banning order application.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many arrests for the offence of entering the playing areas at football grounds have led to football banning orders in the past three football seasons.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many arrests for the offence of entering the playing areas at football grounds have led to football banning orders in the past three football seasons.
The Home Office publishes annual figures on the number of football banning orders issued and the number of football-related arrests in England and Wales in the ‘Football-related arrests and banning orders, England and Wales’ Official Statistics publication. The latest data cover the 2021 to 2022 football season and are available here: Football-related arrests and banning orders, England and Wales: 2021 to 2022 season - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk). Data on the number of football banning orders issued and the number of football-related arrests for pitch incursion since the 2010 to 2011 season are published in tables 1 and 5 of the accompanying data tables.
There were 516 new banning orders issued in the 2021 to 2022 football season, down by 46% since the 2010 to 2011 season.
There were 313 football-related arrests for pitch incursion in the 2021 to 2022 football season, up by 30% since the 2010 to 2011 season.
Data on arrests for the offence of entering the playing area at a designated football match that have led to the imposition of football banning orders is not held. A football banning order is a preventative measure which is not issued as part of a sentence, or solely based on an individual’s conviction offence. In deciding whether to make a banning order, a court may consider a range of prosecution evidence in support of a banning order application.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to tackle disorder at football matches, given the reported increase the number of arrests at matches, and increase in banning orders issued by the courts.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to tackle disorder at football matches, given the reported increase the number of arrests at matches, and increase in banning orders issued by the courts.
We are clear that law abiding fans should be able to enjoy football matches in safety and that violent and disorderly behaviour will not be tolerated.
We have extended coverage of football banning orders to persons convicted of Class A drugs offences at matches, elite domestic women’s football and online hate crime offences connected to football
We have also amended the threshold test to increase the likelihood that a court will impose a banning order following a conviction for football-related offences that are violent, disorderly or cause harm to others.
Council budgets are obviously a matter for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and they will be set out in the local government funding settlement in a few weeks’ time. When it comes to police budgets, which are the Home Office’s responsibility, as I have said once or twice already, the budget this year is £1.1 billion higher than it was last year—it stands now at £16.9 billion—and by April next year, when the police uplift programme is complete, we will have more uniformed police officers recruited than at any time in our country’s history.
Council budgets are obviously a matter for the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and they will be set out in the local government funding settlement in a few weeks’ time. When it comes to police budgets, which are the Home Office’s responsibility, as I have said once or twice already, the budget this year is £1.1 billion higher than it was last year—it stands now at £16.9 billion—and by April next year, when the police uplift programme is complete, we will have more uniformed police officers recruited than at any time in our country’s history.
In Batley and Spen, we continue to face serious problems of antisocial behaviour, reckless driving and dangerous parking. Ultimately, behaviour change is key, but in the short term, neighbourhood police and local councils need the resources to catch and punish those who show no respect to our communities. When will the Government properly invest in neighbourhood policing, and when will they stop cutting already stretched council budgets so that councils can use their power to tackle dangerous parking?
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the highest number of previous convictions for breaching an antisocial behaviour order was for an individual convicted of a further breach of an antisocial behaviour order in each of the last three years who was not given a sentence of immediate...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the highest number of previous convictions for breaching an antisocial behaviour order was for an individual convicted of a further breach of an antisocial behaviour order in each of the last three years who was not given a sentence of immediate...
The highest number of previous convictions for a person convicted of a further offence in 2014-2016 who was not given a sentence of immediate custody, and what the sentence was for the most such recent offence in each such case, broken down by offence, can be viewed in the table.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many Anti-Social Behaviour Orders on conviction were granted in each year from 2004/05 to 2013/14; and how many Criminal Behaviour Orders were granted in each year from 2014/15 to present.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many Anti-Social Behaviour Orders on conviction were granted in each year from 2004/05 to 2013/14; and how many Criminal Behaviour Orders were granted in each year from 2014/15 to present.
The number of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) on conviction granted in each year from 2004/05 to 2013/14 at all courts in England and Wales is shown in the attached table 1. The number of Criminal Behaviour Orders (CBOs) granted in each year from 2014/15 to the end of 2016 (latest currently available) at all courts in England and Wales is shown in the attached table 2.
The Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO) came in to force on 20 October 2014 and replaced the Anti-Social Behaviour Order on conviction.
Court proceedings data for 2017 are planned for publication in May 2018.
A Westminster Hall debate on Tackling aggressive antisocial behaviour is scheduled for Tuesday 10 October 2017 at 9.30am. The Member leading the debate is Steve McCabe MP.
A Westminster Hall debate on Tackling aggressive antisocial behaviour is scheduled for Tuesday 10 October 2017 at 9.30am. The Member leading the debate is Steve McCabe MP.
This House of Lords Library briefing covers powers under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 in relation to measures to tackle anti-social behaviour, dangerous dogs, introduction of new fire arm offences and the criminalisation of forced marriage in advance of the question for short debate on 8 September 2016.
This House of Lords Library briefing covers powers under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 in relation to measures to tackle anti-social behaviour, dangerous dogs, introduction of new fire arm offences and the criminalisation of forced marriage in advance of the question for short debate on 8 September...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what costs have been incurred in (a) legal aid and (b) other court costs arising from the issuing of anti-social behaviour orders in the last 12 months for which figures are available.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what costs have been incurred in (a) legal aid and (b) other court costs arising from the issuing of anti-social behaviour orders in the last 12 months for which figures are available.
The Legal Aid Agency made payments totalling £1,309,000 in relation to stand alone anti-social behaviour order proceedings in magistrates’ courts in England and Wales between October 2013 and September 2014. HM Courts and Tribunals Service does not separately record court costs in relation to anti-social behaviour orders.
My Lords, the order before the Committee today amends Schedule 1 to the LASPO Act 2012 to maintain the status quo regarding the provision of legal aid for proceedings involving gang injunctions in respect of under-18s and to reflect the expansion of advocacy in special educational needs matters. It also...
My Lords, the order before the Committee today amends Schedule 1 to the LASPO Act 2012 to maintain the status quo regarding the provision of legal aid for proceedings involving gang injunctions in respect of under-18s and to reflect the expansion of advocacy in special educational needs matters. It also...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for moving and explaining the order. It is always rather worrying when one reads in a background note that, as became apparent in the words the Minister used today, an order that had gone through Parliament was defective. It is hard to know whether...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for moving and explaining the order. It is always rather worrying when one reads in a background note that, as became apparent in the words the Minister used today, an order that had gone through Parliament was defective. It is hard to know whether...
I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her comments on this. Clearly, I do not accept all that she says about the LASPO Act, which, in the Government’s view, was a necessary correction to
reflect the amount of money that was being spent on legal aid. Some difficult choices...
I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her comments on this. Clearly, I do not accept all that she says about the LASPO Act, which, in the Government’s view, was a necessary correction to
reflect the amount of money that was being spent on legal aid. Some difficult choices...
Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many anti-social behaviour orders have been issued to people living in the London Borough of Havering in each year since 2011.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many anti-social behaviour orders have been issued to people living in the London Borough of Havering in each year since 2011.
Information on numbers of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) issued, which is collected centrally by the Ministry of Justice and held on the Court Proceedings Database, does not include the constituency in which the ASBO recipient resides. This detailed information is only held by courts on individual case files and is not reported to the Ministry of Justice.
It is therefore not possible to determine from centrally held information how many people in the London Borough of Havering have been issued with an ASBO.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people in Barnsley East constituency were prosecuted for breaches of anti-social behaviour orders in (a) 2009, (b) 2010, (c) 2011, (d) 2012 and (e) 2013.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people in Barnsley East constituency were prosecuted for breaches of anti-social behaviour orders in (a) 2009, (b) 2010, (c) 2011, (d) 2012 and (e) 2013.
Information on proceedings for the offence of breach of an Anti-Social Behaviour Order, which is collected centrally by the Ministry of Justice
and held on the Court Proceedings Database, does not include the constituency in which the ASBO recipient resides. This detailed information is only held by courts on individual case files and is not reported to the Ministry of Justice.
It is therefore not possible to determine from centrally held information how many people in Barnsley East constituency have been proceeded against for breach of an ASBO.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans she has to reform anti-social behaviour orders; and if she will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans she has to reform anti-social behaviour orders; and if she will make a statement.
The Government’s reforms are contained in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. The Act will introduce two new powers, a civil injunction and the criminal behaviour order, to replace antisocial behaviour orders. Unlike antisocial behaviour orders, the new powers will not focus solely on enforcement but can include positive requirements to ensure individuals address the underlying causes of their behaviour.
Currently schedule 7 to the Government of Wales Act 2006 includes an exception to the National Assembly’s competence in relation to “anti-social behaviour orders”. As a result, an amendment to schedule 7 to that Act is necessary to ensure the exception’s continuing operation following the reforms made in this Bill.
In...
Currently schedule 7 to the Government of Wales Act 2006 includes an exception to the National Assembly’s competence in relation to “anti-social behaviour orders”. As a result, an amendment to schedule 7 to that Act is necessary to ensure the exception’s continuing operation following the reforms made in this Bill.
In...
My hon Friend the Minister of State for Crime Prevention (Norman Baker) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:
Currently Schedule 7 to the Government of Wales Act 2006 includes an exception to the National Assembly’s competence in relation to ‘anti-social behaviour orders’. As a result, an amendment to Schedule...
My hon Friend the Minister of State for Crime Prevention (Norman Baker) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:
Currently Schedule 7 to the Government of Wales Act 2006 includes an exception to the National Assembly’s competence in relation to ‘anti-social behaviour orders’. As a result, an amendment to Schedule...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will take steps to ensure the preservation of religious liberty within the guidance on her planned Injunction to Prevent Nuisance or Annoyance orders.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will take steps to ensure the preservation of religious liberty within the guidance on her planned Injunction to Prevent Nuisance or Annoyance orders.
The statutory guidance to the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill will make clear that, in deciding whether to grant an injunction under clause 1, a court would be obliged to exercise its discretion in a way that is compatible with an individual's rights under the European convention on human rights, including their right to manifest their religious beliefs under article 9 of the convention.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations she has had from local and community bodies on her plans to replace anti-social behaviour orders with Injunction to Prevent Nuisance or Annoyance orders.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations she has had from local and community bodies on her plans to replace anti-social behaviour orders with Injunction to Prevent Nuisance or Annoyance orders.
The 2011 consultation sought views on the proposed replacements for a number of powers available to deal with antisocial behaviour. A total of 340 local and community bodies responded to the consultation. Overall, 42% thought the civil injunction would be more effective in tackling antisocial behaviour, with only 13% thinking it would be less effective. We are continuing to work with the professionals who will use the new powers, so that they can shape the proposals so that we get the reforms right first time.