Proceeding contribution from Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL].
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL]
My Lords, the rule of discovery is not absolute and written in stone, never to be changed. Why should not the rules about what discovery must be given be modified as they apply to security-sensitive material?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c1311
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Crime Convictions Electronic surveillance Intelligence services Drugs Identification of criminals Prosecutions Terrorism Surveillance Telecommunications Trials Telephone tapping Interception warrants
- Legislation
- Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 18:32:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277264
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277264
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277264