Proceeding contribution from Baroness Park of Monmouth (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 18 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL].
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill [HL]
My Lords, does the noble Lord agree that there is a difference between the views of Sir Swinton Thomas and the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, who are privy to all the issues, and, I am sorry to say, the view of all of us? Secondly, does the noble Lord agree that what Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, said referred to criminal cases? Our point is that it might work for criminal cases, but once you start on that slippery path, it will go on to the rest.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c1316
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Crime Convictions Electronic surveillance Intelligence services Drugs Identification of criminals Prosecutions Terrorism Surveillance Telecommunications Trials Telephone tapping Interception warrants
- Legislation
- Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 18:31:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277274
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277274
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277274