Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Neuberger (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on NHS Redress Bill [HL].


NHS Redress Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 24:"Page 3, line 24, leave out ““to whose liability a scheme applies”” and insert ““independent of those bodies or other persons as defined in section 1(3) as authorised by the Secretary of State””" The noble Baroness said: The amendment again comes to the core of our concerns about much of the Bill. I may be misreading the Bill, but it seems that there is no real provision for the people concerned to be independent. We want to insert,"““independent of those bodies or other persons as defined in section 1(3) as authorised by the Secretary of State””," to force a degree of independence into the consideration. At the moment, the organisations,"““to whose liability a scheme applies””—" so members of the scheme, arguably—decide whether the case ought to be considered. It would be far better for an independent element to be involved. I suspect that the Law Society has made representations to a lot of us about the legislation. It was very concerned about the provision and equally concerned that there was a lack of independence in the phrasing. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c374GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Courts Civil proceedings Advisory services Hospitals Health services Inquiries Evidence Eligibility Liability Exemptions Injuries NHS Patients Protection Payments Negligence Time limits Torts
Legislation
NHS Redress Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk