Proceeding contribution from John Bercow (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 28 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Childcare Bill.
Childcare Bill
My hon. Friend has identified one example in which what the Government said does not appear to match that for which the Bill provides. It is clear from clauses 12 and 13 that there will be an obligation to provide advice and assistance to parents and, in certain circumstances, to provide training to child care providers. Given that none of those is currently a duty under statute, it logically follows that all are new. Why is it that the Secretary of State is right and the head of the early years development partnership in Buckinghamshire is somehow wrong?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c36
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Disclosure of information Children in care Childcare Disadvantaged Age Babies Childminding Employment Inspections Disqualification Local government Low incomes Powers of entry Parents Pre-school education Local government services Staff Registration Welfare tax credits Standards Schools Training Regulation Take-up
- Legislation
- Childcare Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:19:22 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281036
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281036
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281036