Proceeding contribution from John Bercow (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 28 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Childcare Bill.
Childcare Bill
This theme has percolated much of the debate. I confess that I am much more sanguine about the provision than some of my colleagues, many of whom have focused on the word ““taught””. I am keen to close down this part of the argument, and I would like to suggest that the real problem in clause 41 lies in its use of adult language to describe things that we hope very young kids will be able to do. We are not seeking to create mini-intellectuals, but the problem lies in the Bill’s use of such phrases as"““knowledge and understanding of the world””" to describe circumstances applicable to nought to five-year-olds.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c85
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Disclosure of information Children in care Childcare Disadvantaged Age Babies Childminding Employment Inspections Disqualification Local government Low incomes Powers of entry Parents Pre-school education Local government services Staff Registration Welfare tax credits Standards Schools Training Regulation Take-up
- Legislation
- Childcare Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:20:41 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281108
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281108
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_281108