Proceeding contribution from Eric Forth (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
My hon. Friend pre-empts something of what I thought I might explore myself. I have a similar reference, which I may cite should I catch your eye, Madam Deputy Speaker. Has he any feel for the relative costs of the national structure—buildings, staff and so on—on the one hand, which would be required by a national valuation approach, as opposed to a more transient, small, mobile force that could move around the country, on a local or regional basis, as he described? We might be able to tempt the House to vote for the amendment of our hon. Friend the Member for Mole Valley (Sir Paul Beresford) if we could demonstrate that benefit.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c433
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Council tax ICT Increases Local government Local government finance Property Prices Valuation Tax rates and bands Timetables Time limits Tax yields Valuation Office Agency
- Legislation
- Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:46:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282512
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282512
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282512