Proceeding contribution from Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
That is an interesting point. I reiterate my declaration in the Register of Members’ Interests that I am a fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, and I think it an excellent idea to contract out some revaluation work. I seem to have unwittingly provided the very reason why it should happen—because then the Valuation Office Agency would not need such a huge permanent overhead. I am beginning to think that my hon. Friend’s amendment might not be so bad after all. When there was a rash of revaluation, it would be a good idea for the private sector to do some of the work. I want to move on to the next section of my speech—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c449
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Council tax ICT Increases Local government Local government finance Property Prices Valuation Tax rates and bands Timetables Time limits Tax yields Valuation Office Agency
- Legislation
- Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:47:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282569
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282569
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282569