Proceeding contribution from Eric Forth (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
One problem with the amendment is that it deliberately leaves that open, which gives rise to the danger that my hon. Friend points out. By using a phrase as vague as"““a group of adjoining billing authorities””," the amendment may leave too much flexibility, for the reasons that he describes. I shall come back to that thought later, because I do not want to get distracted. [Interruption.] Not half.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c459
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Council tax ICT Increases Local government Local government finance Property Prices Valuation Tax rates and bands Timetables Time limits Tax yields Valuation Office Agency
- Legislation
- Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:46:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282618
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282618
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282618