Proceeding contribution from Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill
I entirely agree with my hon. Friend. The Crown Prosecution Service guidelines do not go far enough. They refer to people doing what they"““honestly and instinctively believe is necessary in the heat of the moment””," but that could cover a multitude of things, some of which could well lead to the death of an intruder. However, under the heading ““Will you believe the intruder rather than me?””, the guidelines say:"““We hope that everyone understands that the police have a duty to investigate incidents involving a death or injury.””" It is still the case that an innocent victim will be subject to a police investigation and thus public attention.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c502
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
- Legislation
- Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:10:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282951
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282951
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282951