Proceeding contribution from Nick Palmer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill
I will not correct the hon. Gentleman’s grammar. [Hon. Members: ““Go on.””] We all support the new literacy drive. We all accept that the more isolated the property, the more people worry that they will not get an immediate response from the police. If we are honest, that worry will always exist, regardless of the level of policing. We will never have a policeman within immediate reach of every isolated farmhouse.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c510
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
- Legislation
- Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:10:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282988
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282988
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_282988