Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.


Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for clarifying his position. The position of the Association of Chief Police Officers has not changed since the hon. Member for Newark introduced his Bill. When the leaflet that I mentioned was launched, Chris Fox, the then ACPO chair, said:"““We want everyone to clearly understand that they can use force to protect themselves or others. The force used should be reasonable force.””" Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan police commissioner, gave his support to the ACPO position after the problems that he had had on the ““Today”” programme on his first day. The Metropolitan police have since indicated that that remains their position. We already know that the Director of Public Prosecutions is of the same view. Mr. Anthony Scrivener QC, who was Tony Martin’s barrister, has said on several occasions that he believes that the law is right. On 14 December 2004r, he said in the Eastern Daily Press:"““The law is simple and weighted overwhelmingly in favour of the householder.””" On 15 December 2004, The Times quoted him as saying:"““Even if the suggested test of grossly disproportionate force had been used it is likely that the jury would still have convicted.””" He went on to say:"““The law is quite right to favour the use of force against them””—" the intruders—"““in such a situation, as it already does””."


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c540-1 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
Legislation
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk