Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill
I think that my hon. Friend is wrong in that respect because—my hon. Friend the Member for Broxtowe may have been highlighting the problem—when one examines all the definitions of ““vehicle””, one realises that it may not actually mean a vehicle. It is a little more confusing than that, as will become apparent when I look at the definition of ““building”” later in my remarks.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c544
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
- Legislation
- Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:07:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283162
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283162
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283162