Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill
My hon. Friend makes a good point. I hope to explore the difference between civil and criminal law later in my remarks. An important issue has been raised by the Opposition when they say, ““We are only aligning criminal law with civil law.”” In fact, they are not. Weird and strange anomalies are created. The differences between the criminal and civil law systems must be explained if we are to ensure that the House has all the facts and arguments before it before deciding whether to give the Bill a Second Reading. Clause 1 introduces new subsection (1A) to section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1967 by referring to the definition of ““person””. There follows the issue of phraseology.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c547
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
- Legislation
- Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:18:39 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283176
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283176
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283176