Proceeding contribution from Lord Khan of Tooting (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill
I am really troubled by that last example. My mind is drawn to our police officers, who are governed by their disciplinary codes, as well as by the civil law. Having read about these matters, what guidance would my hon. Friend give to a police officer giving chase, for example, to a teenage trespasser on a building site or on the railway—my hon. Friend the Member for Lewisham, West (Jim Dowd) mentioned tunnels earlier. How would the police officer know how not to fall foul of the Bill’s provisions, by contrast with the provisions of the disciplinary code or the civil law provisions that might apply if they were sued, if someone were assaulted as a result of the way in which the police officer behaved?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c560
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
- Legislation
- Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:19:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283236
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283236
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283236