Proceeding contribution from Nick Palmer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 2 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill.
Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill
Does my hon. Friend agree that we would end up back where we started if we gave householders the advice that the law is not completely clear and that they must rely on the common sense of the jury and behave reasonably, which makes the task of the jury that much harder? Does not he agree that there will be situations in which the use of force to make an arrest is an ongoing process? The police officer might have to hit the suspect several times to subdue him. If the first blow was in a building, and the second blow was not, the question arises as to whether the first blow has become disproportionate.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c561
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crimes against the person Crimes of violence Criminal law Buildings Burglary Criminal liability Firearms Protection Police Prosecutions Property Victims Trespass Self-defence
- Legislation
- Criminal Law (Amendment) (Protection of Property) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:19:41 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283244
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283244
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283244