Proceeding contribution from Lord Howe of Aberavon (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on UK Worldwide Interests.
UK Worldwide Interests
My Lords, I thank all the noble Lords who joined in this interesting and diverse debate. I particularly thank the Minister for his reply, which was as comprehensive as ever. Some cynical lawyers say that even in an affidavit the truth will out. The truth that has emerged in his reply is that his heart is in the right place, and we express our appreciation for that. I also want to express my appreciation for the remarks made by the noble Baroness, Lady Symons of Vernham Dean, and express our general admiration for her performance during her long stint in the field in this House. It is good to see her back, even if it is on the wrong bit of the Front Bench. I also express my pleasure at finding myself in partnership once again with the noble Lord, Lord Wright of Richmond. We always argued as to which one of us was the other’s boss, and have never really resolved it, but it was a useful partnership. Of course, as everyone else has, I also welcome the remarkable maiden speech of the noble Lord, Lord Patten of Barnes. It has rightly been proclaimed as Patten-speak. It was interesting that the Patten-speak ace was swiftly trumped by Park-speak. They must be labelled together as ““Oxford-speak””, which I say with regret. They effectively exposed the instincts of the Treasury with great candour. We all recognise that the Treasury instinctively wishes to erode the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, but that is almost secondary to the bluster from No. 10 rather than No. 11 in Downing Street, which is a wish not to erode but to control. That message came out loud and clear. I must attribute my final remark to the noble Lord, Lord Goodlad. We all agree that the resources for this important aspect of promoting Britain’s interests should be realistic and not exiguous. I am sure that everyone in the House will share my hope that today’s debate will have at least some effect in getting that message through to both No. 10 and No. 11. I beg leave to withdraw the Motion for Papers. Motion for Papers, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c795
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Closures Allowances Diplomatic service Career development Finance Languages Foreign policy Non-departmental public bodies Overseas students Training Foreign and Commonwealth Office BBC World Service Embassies British Council Scholarships
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:23:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285360
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285360
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285360