Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.
Identity Cards Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for a reply of clarity which it was perhaps not possible to give on 7 November. I say that in my most charitable way. I assume from what the Minister said today that he just gave a resounding ““Yes”” to the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead. In that spirit, I am delighted to beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 8 agreed to. Clause 9 [ID cards for those compulsorily registered]: [Amendments Nos. 152 to 160 not moved.] Clause 9 agreed to. [Amendment No. 161 not moved.] Clause 10 [Functions of persons issuing designated documents]: [Amendment No. 161A not moved.] Clause 10 agreed to. Clause 11 [Power to require information for validating Register]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1270-1
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Biometrics Crime prevention Costs British nationality Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Information Proof of identity Passports Registration
- Legislation
- Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:07:33 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286831
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286831
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286831