Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Northesk (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Identity Cards Bill.


Identity Cards Bill

I thank all Members of the Committee who have contributed to the debate. I also thank the Minister for his responses. I make the general point that, undoubtedly, we will have to return to fees on Report. Clearly a number of concerns and anxieties remain, not least in the mind of the noble Lord, Lord Phillips. As to the narrower point raised by my amendment, I take the Minister’s point that it could be difficult to assess when a requirement to cancel an individual’s card has not been occasioned by his own fault. Indeed, I had not intended the amendment to apply with respect to lost cards. Nevertheless, in the circumstances that I cited—for example, a card reader chewing up a card or corrupting the data on it—I feel it a little mean-spirited for the Government not to be a bit more generous. I shall carefully reflect on the debate but, in the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 177 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.] Clause 13 agreed to. Clause 14 [Provision of information for verification or otherwise with consent]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1286 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Biometrics Crime prevention Costs British nationality Fraud Fees and charges Identity cards Information Proof of identity Passports Registration
Legislation
Identity Cards Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk